Author Guidelines Peer Review Reviewers Focus and Scope Publication Ethics Copyright Notice Author(s) Fee About misconduct
Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
- Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
- The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
- The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
Strategy & Policy
Including but not limited to critical analysis, summary, and evaluation of previous research.
Requirements:
- No more than 4000 words
- ≤8 tables and/or figures
- Structured abstract
- At least 25 references
- Follow the recommended outcomes reporting guidelines
Editorial
Editorials are articles which usually respond to a topical issue and must be evidence based.
Requirements:
- No more than 4000 words
- ≤8 tables and/or figures
- Structured abstract
- At least 25 references
- Follow the recommended outcomes reporting guidelines
Review
Review articles should clearly state the purpose, scope, and guiding research questions. They must critically analyze and synthesize existing studies to provide new conceptual insights, frameworks, or directions for future research in engineering education.
Authors should specify the review type (e.g., systematic review or meta-analysis) and describe inclusion criteria, search strategies, and analytical methods in sufficient detail to ensure transparency. When conclusions depend on the quality of primary sources, the evaluation criteria must be clearly explained.
Each review article should include at least 20 references to ensure comprehensive coverage of the literature.
Research Article & Research Highlight
Context of research advances current engineering education body of knowledge.
Requirements:
- 8000 - 10000 words
- ≤8 tables and/or figures
- Structured abstract
- At least 25 references
- Follow the recommended outcomes reporting guidelines
Letter
Concise, focused reports of original articles.
Requirements:
• No more than 1400 words
• ≤4 tables and/or figures
• No more than 15 references
• No more than 5 authors
• Follow the recommended outcomes reporting guidelines
Comment
Customarily, comments refer to content published in the journal within the past year.
Requirements:
• No more than 1400 words
• No more than 5 authors
Other
Interview, Forum and Special Topic are solicited by the editorial board.
Inaugural Editorial
Perspective
Editorial & Opinion
This section provides a forum for timely perspectives and critical reflections on emerging issues in engineering education, including both editorials and opinion papers.
Editorials present concise commentaries on current developments or policy debates, either solicited or voluntarily submitted.
Opinion papers offer well-reasoned reflections, conceptual discussions, or informed viewpoints aimed at stimulating dialogue and advancing research or practice.
References are not mandatory but may be included when appropriate.
Research
Authors should clearly define their research questions, situate the study within the relevant literature, and ground their work in appropriate theoretical frameworks. Research design choices must be justified, and the methodology described in sufficient detail to ensure rigor and reproducibility.
For empirical studies, data analysis should support the interpretation of results, and conclusions should clearly articulate the study’s contribution to advancing research and practice in engineering education.
For conceptual or theoretical papers, arguments should be well supported by literature and present a coherent rationale that demonstrates their significance to engineering education.
Copyright Notice
Copyright notice is available here.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.



