Cost-effectiveness analysis of mirogabalin in treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and post-herpetic neuralgia in China | Health Decision

Cost-effectiveness analysis of mirogabalin in treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and post-herpetic neuralgia in China

Authors

  • Yao Wu
  • Libo Tao
  • Chang Liu
  • Fangxu Wang
  • Shuang Sun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54844/hd.2024.0002

Keywords:

cost-effectiveness, mirogabalin, diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, postherpetic neuralgia

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of mirogabalin in treatment of Chinese patients with DPNP or PHN, and to discuss

its reasonable pricing strategy.

Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed by constructing a three-state Markov model (mild, moderate, and

severe pain) to compare mirogabalin with placebo and pregabalin for DPNP or PHN patients from Chinese healthcare system

perspective. The efficacy parameters were derived from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing mirogabalin with placebo in

the treatment of PHN or DPNP, as well as from network meta-analyses comparing mirogabalin/pregabalin with placebo RCTs.

The health utility values were obtained from published literatures. Cost parameters contained cost of pregabalin, supportive

care, and other medical resource utilization, were sourced from both published literature and public price database. Sensitivity

analysis was conducted on key parameters to verify the stability of the results.

Results: With one-year time horizon, for PHN, the incremental quality-adjusted life years (ΔQALYs) of mirogabalin compared with

placebo and pregabalin were 0.048 and 0.025 respectively; For DPNP, the ΔQALYs of mirogabalin compared with placebo and

pregabalin were 0.021 and 0.017 respectively. Using the national volume-based procurement price of pregabalin as a reference,

with 1 and 3 times the per capita GDP in China (¥89,358, 2023) as thresholds, the daily cost of mirogabalin was found to be

cost-effectiveness when it was within 1.64 times (DPNP) or 2.07 times (PHN), 2.47 times (DPNP) or 3.46 times (PHN) of the

daily cost of pregabalin. One-way sensitivity showed that, utility values of mild and moderate pain, costs of mirogabalin had the

biggest influence on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Conclusion: As a novel calcium channel modulator, the cost-effectiveness of mirogabalin is greatly influenced by the reference

drug. When pricing in China, it is essential to select appropriate comparator drugs and their prices as references.

Key words: cost-effectiveness, mirogabalin, diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, postherpetic neuralgia

Downloads

Published

2024-07-12

How to Cite

1.
Wu Y, Tao L, Liu C, Wang F, Sun S. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mirogabalin in treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and post-herpetic neuralgia in China. Health Decision. 2024;2(S1). doi:10.54844/hd.2024.0002

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
ABSTRACT

Cost-effectiveness analysis of mirogabalin in treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and post-herpetic neuralgia in China


Yao Wu1, Libo Tao1,2*, Chang Liu1, Fangxu Wang1, Shuang Sun1

1Center for Health Policy and Technology Assessment, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100038, China

2Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100091, China


*Corresponding Author:

Libo Tao, E-mail: taolibo@hsc.pku.edu.cn


Received: 15 June 2024 Published: 15 July 2024


ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of mirogabalin in treatment of Chinese patients with DPNP or PHN, and to discuss its reasonable pricing strategy.

Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed by constructing a three-state Markov model (mild, moderate, and severe pain) to compare mirogabalin with placebo and pregabalin for DPNP or PHN patients from Chinese healthcare system perspective. The efficacy parameters were derived from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing mirogabalin with placebo in the treatment of PHN or DPNP, as well as from network meta-analyses comparing mirogabalin/pregabalin with placebo RCTs. The health utility values were obtained from published literatures. Cost parameters contained cost of pregabalin, supportive care, and other medical resource utilization, were sourced from both published literature and public price database. Sensitivity analysis was conducted on key parameters to verify the stability of the results.

Results: With one-year time horizon, for PHN, the incremental quality-adjusted life years (ΔQALYs) of mirogabalin compared with placebo and pregabalin were 0.048 and 0.025 respectively; For DPNP, the ΔQALYs of mirogabalin compared with placebo and pregabalin were 0.021 and 0.017 respectively. Using the national volume-based procurement price of pregabalin as a reference, with 1 and 3 times the per capita GDP in China (¥89,358, 2023) as thresholds, the daily cost of mirogabalin was found to be cost-effectiveness when it was within 1.64 times (DPNP) or 2.07 times (PHN), 2.47 times (DPNP) or 3.46 times (PHN) of the daily cost of pregabalin. One-way sensitivity showed that, utility values of mild and moderate pain, costs of mirogabalin had the biggest influence on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Conclusion: As a novel calcium channel modulator, the cost-effectiveness of mirogabalin is greatly influenced by the reference drug. When pricing in China, it is essential to select appropriate comparator drugs and their prices as references.

Key words: cost-effectiveness, mirogabalin, diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, postherpetic neuralgia