Engineering Education Review
https://www.hksmp.com/journals/eer
<p><strong>Background</strong></p> <p> The complex and ever-changing world, as the rapid development of new technologies present unprecedented opportunities and challenges to engineering education, which propels social progress and determines the future of humanity. However, there is not a special review of engineering education journal.</p> <p><strong>aims and scope</strong></p> <p>Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this journal focuses on professional development, aim to display cutting-edge and topical issues, to lead disciplinary innovation, and to promote academic communications. The journal publishes critical analysis, summary, and evaluation of previous research to expand new perspectives, to guide paradigm shifts in engineering education, and to improve academic discourse and practice systems.</p> <p><strong>target audience</strong></p> <p>Experts and scholars engaged in the field of engineering education, teachers and students of primary and secondary schools, universities, researchers in research institutions, educational policy makers and implementers of various countries, etc.</p> <p><strong>covered disciplines or sub-disciplines</strong><strong>(> 10 Hot topics should be listed)</strong></p> <ul> <li>engineering science education</li> <li>engineering technology education</li> <li>engineering management education</li> <li>engineering culture education</li> <li>global trends and frontiers in engineering education</li> <li>engineering education strategy research</li> <li>reform and practice of engineering education</li> <li>comparative analysis of regional engineering education</li> <li>interdisciplinary engineering education</li> <li>soft science research in engineering education.</li> </ul> <p>other topics related with engineering education.</p>Scholar Media Publishingen-USEngineering Education Review2959-6890Education for ethical STEM: Scientific social responsibility and public policy
https://www.hksmp.com/journals/eer/article/view/823
<p>This article reviews and reflects on the role of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) by highlighting the</p> <p>importance of scientific social responsibility (SSR) and its implications to ethical education and public policy making. With</p> <p>special reference to artificial intelligence (AI) and biomedical technology, it argues that the development of a keen awareness</p> <p>and ethical standards has become a pressing need for research and educational institutions. Selected country cases are</p> <p>reviewed as examples to show the "state of the art" and indicate the complexity of major issues involved. The role of United</p> <p>Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in promoting AI ethics is illuminated. Education for</p> <p>ethical STEM as well as public policy guidance are emphasized to foster SSR as a golden rule for any basic research and</p> <p>applied undertaking.</p>Sheying ChenAdam ChenJia GuJiansong XuXuejuan Chen
Copyright (c) 2025 Sheying Chen, Adam Chen, Jia Gu, Jiansong Xu, Xuejuan Chen
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2025-03-052025-03-052312012810.54844/eer.2024.0823Innovative interdisciplinary models in engineering education: Transforming practices across global universities
https://www.hksmp.com/journals/eer/article/view/846
<p>The growing complexities of global challenges necessitate a transformative shift in engineering education, prioritizing</p> <p>interdisciplinary collaboration. This study explores innovative interdisciplinary models implemented by leading universities</p> <p>worldwide, including three European universities (University College London [UCL], Delft University of Technology, Aalborg</p> <p>University), three American universities (Stanford University, Princeton University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology</p> <p>[MIT]), and three Canadian universities (University of Toronto, McMaster University, and University of Waterloo). It examines</p> <p>and synthesizes talent cultivation frameworks in interdisciplinary engineering education, highlighting key challenges and</p> <p>providing actionable insights. The study also investigates the structural and cultural changes required for effective</p> <p>implementation, focusing on the delicate balance between preserving disciplinary depth and promoting cross-disciplinary</p> <p>integration. Finally, it offers practical strategies centered on leadership, institutional culture, and project-based learning to</p> <p>enable universities to build interdisciplinary competencies and sustain global competitiveness.</p>Lihui Xu
Copyright (c) 2025 Lihui Xu
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2025-03-052025-03-052312914410.54844/eer.2024.0846What core competencies should a great engineer possess? A comparative study from the perspective of engineering undergraduates in China and the United States
https://www.hksmp.com/journals/eer/article/view/818
<p>Excellent engineers are an important strategic talent force of the country. studying its core competencies and development status serves as the critical foundation for the cultivation of these talents in the new era. One questionnaire for 2460 engineering undergraduates from a first-class university suggests that the core competence is comprised of knowledge, skills, and competence/ability/capacity. Students value basic knowledge including mathematics, physics, chemistry, and engineering science, while also attach great important to the skills to apply scientific engineering knowledge in practice, and the ability to self-motivate and inspire. Economic and business knowledge, leadership, curiosity and the desire to keep learning were the most lacking among students. By further comparing the core competencies of excellent engineers from the perspective of students from China and the United States. it is found that Chinese students highlight the mastery and application of basic knowledge, while American students value effective communication and leadership more. Chinese students value the ability to self-drive and motivation, whereas American students give priority to teamwork and the ability to work in multi-disciplinary teams. To cultivate excellent engineers in the new era, we should strengthen the integration of curriculum in engineering education, emphasize the learning of basic knowledge, expand students potential, forster students' active learning motive, and Create engineering practice scenarios, cultivate the core competencies of future engineers.</p>Yi LiuYintai XiaoXueming He
Copyright (c) 2025 Yi Liu, Yintai Xiao, Xueming He
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2025-03-052025-03-052310911910.54844/eer.2024.0818